As the leader in assessment management systems, Questionmark Perception was an obvious choice, says John Dermo, the university’s E-Assessment Advisor, based in the Learning Technology Team. It now utilises Perception Authoring Manager and a shared repository as well as the Questionmark Blackboard Connector, which enables scheduling and launching of Perception assessments from within the Blackboard environment. “Perception has a wider range of question types, in particular drag-and-drop and text match questions,” says John. “Installing the Blackboard Connector has also transformed the use of formative e-assessment as it has enabled instructors to easily schedule and deliver regular formative and self-assessments through the virtual learning environment.”
Increasingly, lecturers are setting online assessments based on the week’s studies simultaneously with practical or laboratory sessions. Students can take them where and when they choose to receive regular feedback on their progress, which has led to higher rates of engagement, participation and attendance. Instructors also agree they are getting more value out of time previously spent marking test papers by hand as they can develop and improve existing assessment questions, improving the quality and quantity of feedback.
After consultation with academics, administrators and technical support, and organising funding and hardware licences, Perception’s installation was quick. John says the documentation in the Questionmark knowledge base was comprehensive and it was a case of following it step-by-step. The university also made use of the invaluable network of contacts within the Questionmark user community.
The main challenges were related to communication. E-assessment involves a wide range of people – students, instructors, managers, central and department administrators, technical support, academic support, invigilators and so on – so it was important to clarify precisely in the e-assessment process who was responsible for what, how and when. “We wanted to avoid the situation where some vital step in the process might be overlooked because everyone assumed it was someone else’s responsibility,” explains John. Consequently, a flowchart of the process was developed and precise, detailed rules and regulations were drawn up specifying the duties of each group involved. Just as assessment practices for paper-based examinations had been established and documented, the same is now true for computer-assisted assessment. |